Sunday, March 14, 2010

Thank You David Englin! [UPDATE: And Scott Surovell Too!]

What a concept, a Democrat from the "Democratic wing of the Democratic Party!" Thank you David Englin, for speaking the truth about this piece-o'-crap budget.
Budgets are moral documents that express our values as a Commonwealth and determine whom we lift up and whom we leave out. While the final version of the budget is less bad than the initial House version, I still cannot justify supporting a budget that balances the books on the backs of children and the poor and that includes a fiscally irresponsible shell game with the state pension trust fund.

Thanks to strong, unified, vocal opposition from House Democrats, the final budget is less bad than the budget House Republicans passed Feb. 25. For example, the final budget rejected the Republican plan to take money away from poor students and give it to students who are not poor, and it rejected the Republican plan to redirect federal Medicaid enhancement money from health care for the neediest Virginians to non-health care programs.

However, these concessions do not make up for the fact that the final budget cuts billions of dollars from public education, health care for the poor, public safety, and aid to localities, with no serious attempt to mitigate these cuts with revenue and no serious attempt to give localities the power to mitigate these cuts in their own. Even worse, the final budget still includes a risky, $800-million scheme to divert state contributions from the state pension trust fund, which will put Virginia's triple-A bond rating at risk and threaten our ability to meet our pension obligations to teachers, fire fighters, law enforcement officers, and state and local employees.
And how about bringing back the estate tax, repeal of which Tim Kaine foolishly signed into law? Why should we slash services for the neediest Virginians while the top few hundred families (out of millions of residents) get a huge tax break? It's wrong on every level - economic, political, moral - for Democrats to go along with this, so why are they going along with it? I call bull****.

UPDATE: And thank you Scott Surovell!
My grandfather always taught me that you either pay less for things now or you pay more for them later. I do not believe these budget "cuts" are cuts. They are simply reductions in funding on going responsibilities that are now being pushed onto the poor, the uneducated, to middle class families and local government who now have to make the tough decisions.

Educating our children, caring for the poor, and keeping our public safe are a core responsibilities of state government. This Budget does not do that. It balances our budgets on the backs of the poor, the sick, the disabled, college students and their families, and the criminal justice system.

And we haven't done a single thing to resolve this state's transportation crisis.

Exactly!

UPDATE #2: See the Washington Post and WTVR for more on the state budget passage. The vote in the Senate was 34-6, and in the House 73-23. According to Anita Kumar and Rosalind Helderman, "The breakthrough on the budget came when Senate negotiators agreed to eliminate 60 percent of fees that they had proposed to preserve some programs." The result of which, of course, was to harm more vulnerable Virginians. Heckuva job.

6 comments:

  1. No sentient, thinking person can say that they didn't see this coming: Taliban Bob's thesis was made public and Grover Norquist announced that The Republicam Party was going to make government so small that they could drown it in a bathtub!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, bull crap. A budget is not a moral document - it is a political allocation of available resources reflecting attention to those government programs that elected representatives believe will get them reelected in the upcoming election cycle. IF the representatives guessed correctly, they will be reelected; if they didn't, they wont. My guess is the November 2011 election results will show this budget, on the whole, accurately reflects the views of the voters of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

    ReplyDelete
  3. To the contrary, what our elected officials determine to be "available resources" is very much a moral - as well as political - judgment. In this case, the implicit morality is that it's more important to protect rich people than poor and working class people. That's called "Republican morality," also known as "I've got mine so FU."

    ReplyDelete
  4. " . . . the implicit morality is that it's more important to protect rich people than poor and working class people. That's called "Republican morality," also known as "I've got mine so FU." "

    Exactly!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Also, generous corporate welfare as opposed to helping PEOPLE.

    ReplyDelete
  6. with all the concern about the budget cuts the 5% tax hike on all public employees who participate in the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) has gone un-noticed.

    while not officially a tax hike (we know the flat earthers don't do tax increases, just fees, charges, enhancements, add-ons, tariffs, allowances, etc like the 100 million in this year's budget) HB 1189 allows local government to pull the 5% they now contribute to retirement of public servants (those who work for 15-20% less then they could get in the private sector but have opted for job satisfaction, and public service - and a pension) as an exercise in balancing the local budgets due to state underfunding.

    now i can understand if the R's wanted to ping these groups that don't support them in elections, BUT HB 1189 was co sponsored by Bob Brink. the companion senate bill passed 39-1 with on D-Edwards voting against. and in the house the list of people normally thought of supporting working families took a huge dive. 19 voted against


    NAYS--Abbott, Armstrong, Bulova, Carr, Carrico, Ebbin, Englin, Herring, Hope, James, Johnson, Keam, Kory, Plum, Sickles, Surovell, Torian, Tyler, Ward--19.

    notice any names missing from this list?????

    the dem response to our state fire fighters was won't it be wonderful to get several million more in your local budgets? total BS. where will the money come from? the pockets of the public servants.

    this is disappointing to say the least. one thing's for sure, the people who voted for this can take me off their call lists.

    b

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Negative Closings and Wall Street

Now you can profit from positive or negative price movement. Cfds, or spread trading, is based on price differential from start to close, enabling one to profit even in an erratic market